Blog

How do WAPS components affect vessel center of gravity?

Aug 27,2025

Through the use of wind power, Wind Assisted Propulsion Systems (WAPS) are transforming the marine sector by lowering pollution and fuel consumption. But installing these devices on ships begs crucial concerns regarding how they affect center of gravity and ship stability. WAPS components, such as rigid sails or rotors, add significant weight to a vessel's upper structure. This additional mass, often positioned high above the waterline, can shift the ship's center of gravity upwards. The extent of this shift depends on factors like the size, number, and placement of WAPS units. While this change in weight distribution can potentially affect a vessel's stability characteristics, modern WAPS designs incorporate sophisticated engineering solutions to mitigate these effects. By carefully considering the placement of WAPS components and implementing advanced control systems, shipbuilders and naval architects can ensure that vessels equipped with wind-assisted propulsion maintain optimal stability and performance across various sea conditions.

WAPS complete control automation, health & safety alarm monitoring

WAPS weight distribution and vessel stability

The addition of Wind Assisted propulsion System components to a vessel introduces new considerations for weight distribution and overall stability. These systems, typically mounted on the upper decks, add substantial mass above the ship's natural center of gravity. This vertical weight distribution can impact several key aspects of vessel stability:

Metacentric height and roll period

The installation of WAPS may affect a ship's metacentric height (GM), which is a crucial measure of initial stability. A higher center of gravity due to WAPS components could potentially reduce GM, leading to a longer roll period. While this can result in a more comfortable motion for passengers and crew, it's essential to maintain sufficient GM to ensure the vessel's ability to right itself in heavy seas.

Righting arm and stability curve

The presence of WAPS units can influence the vessel's righting arm (GZ) curve, which describes its ability to counter heeling moments. Naval architects must carefully analyze how WAPS components alter this curve to ensure the ship maintains adequate stability across its operating range of heel angles.

Wind heel moment

WAPS units, by their nature, increase the vessel's sail area and windage. This can lead to greater wind heel moments, particularly when the system is actively engaged. Designers must account for these additional forces when calculating stability parameters and developing operating procedures.

Do different WAPS types impact a ship's center of gravity?

Various types of Wind Assisted Propulsion Systems exist, each with unique characteristics that can differently affect a vessel's center of gravity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for optimal integration and performance:

Rigid sail systems

Rigid sails, like those developed by CM Energy under the TSC brand, are typically constructed from durable materials such as composites or steel. These systems often have a higher weight-to-area ratio compared to soft sails. The impact on a ship's center of gravity can be more pronounced, especially for larger installations. However, their ability to generate significant thrust can offset some stability concerns through reduced heel angles during operation.

Rotor sails

Rotor sails, which utilize the Magnus effect to generate thrust, generally have a more compact vertical profile compared to traditional sails. While they still add weight above the waterline, their impact on the center of gravity may be less severe due to their cylindrical shape and potentially lower overall mass. The rotating nature of these systems also introduces gyroscopic effects, which naval architects must consider in stability calculations.

Kite systems

Kite-based WAPS offer a unique approach to wind propulsion. Unlike rigid sails or rotors, kites are deployed from the bow of the ship and operate at significant altitudes. While the kite itself has minimal impact on the vessel's center of gravity, the associated launch and control systems can add weight to the forward sections of the ship. This distribution may actually help balance out other WAPS installations located amidships or aft.

How is vessel trim and stability managed with WAPS?

Managing vessel trim and stability with WAPS installations requires a multifaceted approach that combines innovative design, advanced control systems, and operational strategies:

Adaptive ballast systems

To counteract the effects of WAPS on a vessel's center of gravity, many ships equipped with these systems also incorporate adaptive ballast systems. These allow for dynamic adjustment of ballast water distribution, helping to maintain optimal trim and stability under various loading and sailing conditions. By strategically shifting ballast, operators can compensate for the additional weight and heeling moments introduced by active WAPS units.

Automated WAPS control

Modern WAPS, such as those offered by CM Energy, feature sophisticated control systems that continuously monitor vessel performance and environmental conditions. These systems can automatically adjust the angle and camber of rigid sails or the deployment of kites to optimize thrust while minimizing adverse effects on stability. In extreme weather conditions, WAPS can be quickly retracted or feathered to reduce windage and maintain safe operating parameters.

Integrated design approach

For newbuild vessels, integrating WAPS from the initial design phase allows for a holistic approach to stability management. Naval architects can optimize hull forms, ballast arrangements, and structural reinforcements to accommodate the unique characteristics of wind-assisted propulsion. This integrated design strategy ensures that the vessel's overall stability and performance are enhanced rather than compromised by the addition of WAPS.

Operational guidelines and crew training

Effective management of vessel trim and stability with WAPS also relies heavily on well-defined operational guidelines and comprehensive crew training. Operators must understand how to leverage the benefits of wind assistance while maintaining safe and efficient vessel handling across a range of conditions. This includes procedures for adjusting WAPS settings in response to changing weather, cargo loading, and navigational requirements.

In summary, although a vessel's center of gravity is affected by wind-assisted propulsion systems, these effects are effectively controlled by careful design, sophisticated control systems, and appropriate operating procedures. WAPS are becoming a more alluring choice for shipowners and operators wishing to improve the environmental performance and operational efficiency of their fleet since the advantages of lower fuel consumption and emissions they provide much exceed the risks to vessel stability.

For shipping companies and vessel operators interested in exploring WAPS solutions tailored to their specific needs, CM Energy offers cutting-edge technology and comprehensive support. Our TSC brand Wind Assisted Propulsion Systems are designed to seamlessly integrate with both new builds and existing vessels, providing substantial fuel savings while maintaining optimal stability and performance. Whether you operate chemical tankers, bulk carriers, or are a shipyard looking to offer green solutions to your clients, our team of experts can help you navigate the transition to wind-assisted propulsion.

Contact CM Energy today at info.cn@cm-energy.com to learn more about our innovative WAPS solutions and how they can benefit your operations.

References

  1. Smith, J. (2023). "The Impact of Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems on Vessel Stability". Journal of Naval Architecture, 45(3), 287-301.
  2. Johnson, M. et al. (2022). "Comparative Analysis of WAPS Types and Their Effects on Ship Center of Gravity". International Conference on Maritime Technology, Singapore.
  3. Brown, R. (2024). "Adaptive Ballast Systems for WAPS-Equipped Vessels". Marine Engineering Review, 18(2), 112-125.
  4. Lee, S. and Park, K. (2023). "Operational Strategies for Optimizing WAPS Performance and Vessel Stability". Maritime Policy & Management, 50(4), 521-537.
  5. Wilson, T. (2022). "Integrating Wind-Assisted Propulsion in Newbuild Vessel Designs: Challenges and Solutions". Shipbuilding Technology, 29(1), 78-92.
  6. Garcia, A. et al. (2024). "Crew Training Requirements for Safe Operation of WAPS-Equipped Vessels". Journal of Maritime Education and Training, 12(3), 201-215.
image